Skip to content
HomeVideosBooks
AllTopicsTrends
BlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K
    Cover of Structured analytic techniques for intelligence analysis

    Structured analytic techniques for intelligence analysis

    Richards J. Heuer · 2010

    Security & Privacy
    Open LibraryAmazon
    Stats for nerds
    4recommend
    7mentions
    6people
    2015–2022years
    71% recommend29% neutral

    Mentions per year

    20152016201720182019202020212022

    What Hacker News says

    1. atemerevNov 2022
      Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis (Randolph H. Pherson, Richards J. Heuer Jr.) I am not an intelligence analyst, but this book is very insightful on thinking about your thinking.
      thread
    2. genmudOct 2021
      Not specific to detective books, but nearly identical concepts:

      The Thinkers Toolkit - this has some good techniques for breaking down problems and how to structure your questions.

      Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis - This is I guess more of a textbook for teaching people how to structure analysis and provide some insights in how to approach and analyze different problems.

      thread
    3. JugurthaNov 2020
      The book "Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis" by the same author is more recent and goes into details and applications.

      They go over many biases and attentional phenomena, tools to prevent or mitigate, visualization techniques to address problems (timelines, etc.) with several examples.

      It also goes into explaining the context that practitioners evolve in a context where information can be scarce, contradictory either by happenstance or by design by actors who want to confuse.

      Here's a RAND report titled "Assessing the Value of Structured Analytic Techniques in the U.S. Intelligence Community".

      - [0]: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/...

      thread
    4. JugurthaApr 2018
      Avoiding reading the news does not address a deeper problem: the way we think can be hijacked by people who know how.

      I am reminded of Blaise Pascal's "Pensées" from which I'll try to translate a passage:

      "Man is but a reed, the most feeble in nature; but he is a thinking reed. The universe need not entirely arm itself to crush him: a vapor, a drop of water suffices to kill him. But when the universe would crush him, Man would be even more noble than what kills him, because he knows he's dying, and the advantage the universe has on him, the universe knows none of it. Our dignity consists, then, in thought. It is from this that we must elevate ourselves and not from space or time, which we cannot fill. Let us work, then, to think well; this is the principle of morality."

      Maybe we could look at it from this perspective. That avoiding the news is avoiding a channel we are aware of but not tackling the way we think makes us vulnerable to the channels we're unaware of that use the same mechanics.

      The intelligence community has a body of knowledge on this subject. Richard Heuer and Randolph Pherson's work might interest HN members: "Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis". "Thinking Fast and Slow" has been mentioned here quite often.

      thread
    5. hedgehogFeb 2015
      You'll probably find some transferable ideas and methods for your work in "Psychology of Intelligence Analysis" and the follow up "Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis".
      thread
    6. anonINFPJan 2018
      Do you have much familiarity with those inner workings and workplace tendencies in the intelligence agencies? What are your thoughts on Richards Heuer's work[0] on empirical methodologies to eliminate as much cognitive bias from analysts' assessments as possible (I've read a few techniques from his most recent book "Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis" but haven't read any of his earlier "Psychology of Intelligence Analysis" book). You mention burden of proof being lower for them than in police work, which might make sense given that it's a field where deception and operational secrecy are practically situational constants, but I guess I haven't gotten that impression from reading his work. I'm curious to hear what went into your conclusions.

      [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richards_Heuer

      thread

    Related

    Cover of Psychology of Intelligence Analysis
    2010–2025

    Psychology of Intelligence Analysis

    Richard J., Jr. Heuer
    11 recommend · 25
    Cover of Security Engineering
    2008–2026

    Security Engineering

    Ross J. Anderson
    38 recommend · 60
    Cover of On intelligence
    2007–2026

    On intelligence

    Jeff Hawkins
    114 recommend · 228
    Cover of Superintelligence
    2014–2026

    Superintelligence

    Nick Bostrom
    92 recommend · 234
    Cover of Applied Cryptography
    2008–2026

    Applied Cryptography

    Bruce Schneier
    76 recommend · 258
    Cover of Cryptography engineering
    2010–2026

    Cryptography engineering

    Niels Ferguson
    50 recommend · 116
    Cover of The art of software security assessment
    2008–2025

    The art of software security assessment

    Mark Dowd
    21 recommend · 43
    Cover of The Code Book
    2007–2026

    The Code Book

    Simon Singh
    98 recommend · 148