
Is the deejay a wannabe? Or does the D.J. just want to be?When is heaven capitalized?Do you stand in line or on line?For anyone who writes--short stories or business plans, book reports or news articles--knotty choices of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and meaning lurk in every line: Lay or lie? Who or whom? None is or none are? Is Touch-Tone a trademark? How about Day-Glo? It's enough to send you in search of a Martini. (Or is that a martini?) Now everyone can find answers to these and thousands of other questions in the handy alphabetical guide used by the writers and editors of the world's most authoritative newspaper. The guidelines to hyphenation, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling are crisp and compact, created for instant reference in the rush of daily deadlines. This revised and expanded edition is updated with solutions to the tantalizing problems that plague writers in the new century: How to express the equality of the sexes without using self-conscious devices like "he or she." How to choose thoughtfully between African-American and black; Hispanic and Latino; American Indian and Native American. How to translate the vocabulary of e-mail and cyberspace and cope with the eccentricities of Internet company names and website addresses. With wry wit, the authors, who have more than seventy-five years of combined newsroom experience at the New York Times, have created an essential and entertaining reference tool.From the Trade Paperback edition.
Books: The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage, Shertzer's The Elements of Grammar, and Strunk and White's The Elements of Style.
For example, the Times NEVER uses a lower case "i" when iPhone begins a headline or sentence or picture caption.
It is always "IPhone"
I guess, we could say, much ado about nothing.
[1]: Siegal, Allan (1999). The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage. Three Rivers Press. p. 80.
[2]: Google search query for site:nytimes.com containing "comprised of". URL: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22comprised+of%22+site%3Any...
race should be cited only when it is pertinent and its pertinence is clear to the reader. The race of a victim of a hate crime or the subject of a police search is clearly germane, an essential part of the person’s description. But the race of a person convicted of a crime is not pertinent unless the case has racial overtones; if it does, the overtones should be explained.
[1] https://sincerity.net/stylebooks/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_Manual_of_S...
What details? Things like "do you use 's for possessives even for a word/name ending in s, or is it s'?" or "oxford comma or no?". Writers argue over these just like programmers argue over tabs v spaces or the place of braces. Sure, if you're just blogging for personal use, go crazy, don't worry about a consistent style, do what you want. When writing for publication, instead of arguing over whether or not it's ok to use certain slang or contractions, the editors just chose a preferred way.
Tools like Vale streamline the process of aligning to a style, just like coding style checkers and autoformatters relieve programmers of the tedium fixing up all the indentation manually.