
The Oresteia -- Agamemnon, Choephori, and The Eumenides -- depicts the downfall of the house of Atreus: after King Agamemnon is murdered by Clytemnestra, their son, Orestes, is commanded by Apollo to avenge the crime by killing his mother, and he does so, bringing on himself the wrath of the Furies and the judgment of Athens. Together, the three plays are one of the major achievements of Greek antiquity. - Publisher.
* The Man Who Was Thursday, by GK Chesterton
* The Oresteia, by Aeschylus
* Cyrano de Bergerac, by Edmond Rostand
* The Eye of the World, by Robert Jordan
With the Iliad, it helps to know about the Judgment of Paris but I think my prof at Berkeley simply recited it. I don't know what the 'classic' telling would be.
Of course it helps to have read the Iliad and the Odyssey before the Aeneid. The first half, the Odyssean half, is just a lot more fun because of Dido. She's like Mercutio in Romeo and Juliet. But when Dido does what Dido did then in the Iliadic second half you're stuck with stoic Aeneas (and Turnus) and Aeneas is just not that interesting.
I would say:
1. Judgment of Paris (somehow, somewhere, Robert Graves?)
2. Iliad (I'm a huge fan of Lattimore)
3. Oresteia (at least Agamemnon)
4. Odyssey
5. Aeneid
I could never get into Joyce but I may give him another try.I'm a literature professor, and in academic literary study, we don't spend a lot of time talking about which books are "better" than others. But personally? I'll just never get over that one.
I suppose I'd have to add Aeschylus' The Oresteia (the oldest of the ancient Greek tragedies we possess, and the only complete trilogy). I was a truly terrible high school student, who I think just barely got into college. Reading The Oresteia as a freshman made me decide that one way or another, I would have to figure out how to read and study literature for the rest of my life.
Then Homer. Opinions vary on which translation of the Iliad is best (and it makes a huge difference). I'd stay away from Pope which is more of a remake than a translation. Lombardo is very modern. Lattimore is typically used for academic purposes. I would recommend Fagles.
After that, it depends on what you're into.
Philosophy? Pre-Socratics -> Plato -> Aristotle. What you choose here again depends on what you're into. There's politics, metaphysics, ethics, aesthetics, etc.
History? Herodotus -> Thucydides -> Xenophon (The Landmark series for all 3)
Theater? Oresteia, Medea, the Theban Cycle.
Mythology? Hesiod.
Arguing for lynch mob vengeance shows you are completely inept at managing your feelings of righteous anger, potentially sociopathic in your inability to empathize, unconcerned with accuracy or the case of false positives, and just as lame-brained as every single idiot that hit a car in the Vancouver riots.
Furthermore, you should also know that Axelrod's tit-for-tat game theory strategy wins in iterative situations that continue past the first reaction and also relies on forgiveness.
