Personal blog of Christie Koehler (CK), covering open source community, codes of conduct, inclusive language, and tech industry governance.
HN commenters link it for a write-up on Patreon and money services regulation, and for a critique of Drupal governance decisions that one commenter fully agrees with.
I'm with you 100% here, yeah, and I agree entirely with the points made here [https://subfictional.com/thoughts-on-recent-drupal-governance-decisions/]. But I don't think Dries has the credibility to act in the community's best interest and also in the best interest of Acquia. As an officer of Acquia he has a fiduciary responsibility; his responsibility to Drupal is purely ethical.
I'd argue that Ryan can't really gain from making a claim that Dries is trying to damage his business, because then he's admitting that his business has been damaged without any real recourse. But I do agree that he knows plenty that we don't!
My thesis is not that Crell's behavior was acceptable. I know I don't have the standing to opine on that. My thesis is that Dries isn't accountable for this conflict of interest and the demands of running a venture-backed startup are largely at odds with the demands of running a community worthy of its code of conduct.
Of course, Dries is not the only BDFL with this kind of a conflict of interest. Many of us who have a career on the Internet live in the shade of one tree or another...
You mean any Mozilla employee who's never actually talked to Brendan, right? The people who have interacted with him have this to say:
https://twitter.com/Jason_Duell/status/449276922359320576
http://subfictional.com/2014/03/24/on-brendan-eich-as-ceo-of-mozilla/
(And I saw a few more along those lines on twitter, but trying to search twitter on this topic right now is a bit difficult.)
Oddly enough, the only Mozilla employees I've seen calling for Brendan to step down are employees of the Foundation, not of the Corporation, and as far as I can tell don't deal with him on a regular basis, if at all.
Nice, thanks for editing the post. Sociolinguistics is fascinating; at least not every kind of mismatch/misunderstanding is loaded. And there's a paper for some linguist to write on the hybrid tone of friendly and authoritative that forum moderators find to use.
(Edit: Part of why I consider clear use of "you guys" to be so limited is that when used in professional/quasi-professional tech industry contexts, it can accidentally annoyingly remind readers that we're among very few women around: http://subfictional.com/2012/07/02/language-matters-stop-using-guys-to-address-mix-gender-groups/ )
Conversely, hurting Mozilla is not just hurting Eich, but hurting all the other people who work there, including the very people that OKC is defending.
So despite Eich's personal politics, Mozilla is a place where healthcare is extended to transexuals, and staffers have come out in support of Mozilla org's friendliness to non-straight sexualities, even though they don't support Eich's personal view.
http://subfictional.com/2014/03/24/on-brendan-eich-as-ceo-of-mozilla/
Not taking sides, but I found this analysis by an experienced community manager interesting: https://subfictional.com/thoughts-on-recent-drupal-governance-decisions/
"it's complicated"
For those following up days later, this is what I think as well. Someone else wrote it up:
https://subfictional.com/my-theory-patreon-doesnt-want-to-be-a-money-services-business/