Skip to content
HomeVideosBooksBlogs
AllTop postsTopics
Podcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K
    A

    Astrodigital

    astrodigital.org · Personal blog · on HN since 2012

    Astrodigital is a small site hosting space and computing articles, including the well-known essay on the Space Shuttle and a horse's rear end.

    Visit blogHN submissions
    SpaceHistory
    What HN says

    HN links it for the tale that shuttle size traces back to horse widths, though one commenter doubts details like Roman chariots and cites Snopes.

    Stats for nerds
    29HN people shared it
    10linked in comments
    45story points
    Jul 2026last shared
    2012people per year2026

    Top posts on HN

    1. 1
      The Space Shuttle and the Horse's Rear End (2000)
      27 people · 45 points · first shared 2012 · 15 comments on HN
    2. 2
      Drake equation
      1 person · first shared 2017
    3. 3
      Ebcdic
      1 person · first shared 2018

    What HN people wrote when they linked it

    • sqeakyAug 2017

      Well sorry, for that. Get a piece of paper and try it. The drake equation isn't too hard. It is just a bunch of probabilities multiplied by an amount of stars. You can even add your own terms if you don't like the one you have, but generally doing this takes yo further from the science...

      Anyway, Here is a simple description I snagged from google search [1]:

      > The Drake Equation is:
      > N = R * fp * ne * fl * fi * fc * L
      >
      > where:
      > N = The number of broadcasting civilizations.
      > R = Average rate of formation of suitable stars (stars/year) in the Milky Way galaxy
      > fp = Fraction of stars that form planets
      > ne = Average number of habitable planets per star
      > fl = Fraction of habitable planets (ne) where life emerges
      > fi = Fraction of habitable planets with life where intelligent evolves
      > fc = Fraction of planets with intelligent life capable of interstellar communication
      > L = Years a civilization remains detectable

      Now grab a pen and cocktail and make the math do whatever you want. I think that is you stick to realistic numbers you will get reasonably high values. But we might just disagree there.

      [1] http://www.astrodigital.org/astronomy/drake_equation.html

    • ColinWrightSep 2019

      Here's pretty much the same text dating back from 2000:

      http://www.astrodigital.org/space/stshorse.html

      Snopes wrote about it:

      https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/railroad-gauge-chariots/

      It was also discussed at length here on HN 3 months ago:

      https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20239682

      And another debunking:

      https://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2538/was-standard-railroad-gauge-48-determined-by-roman-chariot-ruts/

      So, nice story. Not true.

    • trhwayMar 2022

      >Stephenson’s narrow tracks had been introduced first. Originally designed to carry engines transporting coal for the northern mining industry, they were tailored to match the width needed for accommodating a horse between wagon shafts.

      there is also interesting related interpretation of Space Shuttle Booster width back to Roman times through the British narrow railway gauge http://www.astrodigital.org/space/stshorse.html

    • KineticLensmanSep 2019

      > Which reminds a bit of http://www.astrodigital.org/space/stshorse.html as well.

      TL;DR - the legend that the width of the shuttle SRBs is derived from a design decision about cart width that goes back to the Romans.

      But it's actually a bit more complicated than that...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard-gauge_railway

    • JuliateSep 2019

      And what's funny, is that originally, this 3/4 minutes formula is likely more tied to physical constraints than marketing/human psychology: https://www.vox.com/2014/8/18/6003271/why-are-songs-3-minutes-long

      Which reminds a bit of http://www.astrodigital.org/space/stshorse.html as well.

    • fredleyJun 2014

      Asker of the question here, you are indeed spot on, Windows 95 was the first OS I used!

      The train of reasoning here reminds me of another story (which I think has been on HN before): Why is a space shuttle engine 4' 8.5" wide?

      http://www.astrodigital.org/space/stshorse.html

    Related

    The Space Reviewthespacereview.com163 people

    My years working on black programs

    The Space Review
    Publication · last shared 2026
    ESA Blogsblogs.esa.int88 people

    Our lander’s asleep

    ESA Blogs
    Company · last shared 2026
    ScienceBlogs 2.0science20.com136 people

    Survival Of The Stupidest

    ScienceBlogs 2.0
    Publication · last shared 2026
    ScienceBlogsscienceblogs.com533 people

    Elsevier = Evil

    ScienceBlogs
    Publication · last shared 2025
    Casey Handmercaseyhandmer.wordpress.com162 people

    We're going to need a lot of solar panels

    Casey Handmer
    Personal · last shared 2026
    Parabolic Arcparabolicarc.com44 people

    Musk: SpaceX to Attempt Falcon 9 First Stage Water Landing

    Parabolic Arc
    Publication · last shared 2023
    The Orbital Indexorbitalindex.com28 people

    DARPA moving forward with nuclear thermal engine design

    The Orbital Index
    Publication · last shared 2026
    Penzbapenzba.co.uk26 people

    High-dimensional spheres are "spikey"

    Penzba
    Personal · last shared 2025