Skip to content
HomeVideosBooksBlogs
AllTop postsTopics
Podcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K
    A

    Armadillo Aerospace

    armadilloaerospace.com · Company blog · on HN since 2007

    Armadillo Aerospace was John Carmack's rocket company, whose site documented its Lunar Challenge flights and development updates.

    Visit blogHN submissions
    SpaceHardware & Electronics
    What HN says

    HN commenters mention it as Carmack's rocket-building venture, noting it was active for six to eight years and citing it in space-industry discussions.

    Stats for nerds
    27HN people shared it
    9linked in comments
    105story points
    Sep 2014last shared
    2007people per year2014

    Top posts on HN

    1. 1
      John Carmack's account of the Lunar Challenge flights.
      1 person · 49 points · first shared 2009 · 5 comments on HN
    2. 2
      John Carmack's Tesla Review at End of Latest Armadillo Update
      2 people · 37 points · first shared 2008 · 26 comments on HN
    3. 3
      The Carmack 100kft Micro Prize (Rocket Science Contest)
      3 people · 7 points · first shared 2011 · Discussion on HN
    4. 4
      Armadillo Aerospace (John Carmack) writeup on 140,000ft rocket flight
      1 person · 3 points · first shared 2011 · Discussion on HN
    5. 5
      Flight report of John Carmack's rocket launch to ~300,000 ft
      1 person · 3 points · first shared 2012 · Discussion on HN
    6. 6
      Armadillo Aerospace to launch The Stig to 30km
      1 person · 2 points · first shared 2011 · Discussion on HN
    7. 7
      Armadillo Aerospace update
      1 person · 2 points · first shared 2013 · Discussion on HN
    8. 8
      Analysis of Armadillo Aerospace's Vehicle Crash w/ video
      1 person · 2 points · first shared 2011 · Discussion on HN
    9. 9
      Home
      6 people · first shared 2007
    10. 10
      Homepage
      6 people · first shared 2007

    What HN people wrote when they linked it

    • bootloadAug 2008

      "... For most blogs and content all we need is simple text :) so light, so clean. ..."

      Plan files?

      Back when linux was new and lots of servers started popping up, .plan (dot plan) files ~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_protocol where the blogs of that era. Easy to read, quick to load you get a heads up of what was going on via text - a lot like HackerNews. And the best .plan files to read had to be iD & John Carmack.

      3/23/1997 - Damaged F40

      Someone ran into my F40 in the
      parking lot, then took off. Words
      cannot do justice to how I feel
      right now.

      If anyone knows a tall white male
      in the dallas area that now has
      red paint and carbon fibre on their
      tan pickup truck, turn the bastard in!

      Not only did you get the best technical insight in to programming they where more personal than blogs, funny even. No ads. No cutting edge design to get in the way of the information. Plan files don't really exist now. Carmack closed his down in 2005 ~ http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/johnc/Recent%20Updates and now blogs like the rest us. An archive exists at http://www.scribd.com/doc/14193/John-Carmack-Archive-plan-1999?from_related_doc=1 Port 79 and plan files went the way of telnet and the Dodo. Btw it was reported the esteemed Rtm and his pesky worm exploit ~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_worm that had a part in plan files demise. After exploiting a buffer overflow in fingerd (among others) [0] "too risky", ISP admins claimed.

      [0] Not…

    • ChuckMcMApr 2011

      Valid questions, but there are some 'known' unknowns which is to say you can't even start if you can't get some way to manipulate the moon on to the surface of the moon. There is a variety of material on the surface [1] which removes the need for excavation. Economically one would want to post process raw regolith into the desired materials to improve the profitability of sending mass back from the moon to earth.

      But what I like about these guys is that they're in kick down the door and get a search warrant later mode. There is a demonstrated capability in the Falcon9 project to get an earth/lunar/lunar-surface mission together. If you borrow the Merlin engine from SpaceX for your rover, autonomous landing in a gravity well with a power variable engine is a solved problem. [2] So most of the questions vis-a-vis "How do I get something on to the surface to mine?" is an engineering / cost problem rather than a 'create from whole cloth' problem.

      The 'knotty bits' in this particular endeavor are then three;

      a) Do we deliver a return capability to the surface (aka a return craft) or do we create it on the surface from materials we find there?

      b) What is the energy infrastructure, solar? nuclear? And do we build it on site or do we transport it?

      c) Of the prioritized targets (in terms of value per lifted ounce of the surface and into low earth orbit) what are the extraction techniques for each and their repeatability?

      That would be a helluva lot of fun to play with wouldn't…

    • imperatorNov 2010

      In a way you are both right. There are currently two aspects of the American space industry.

      One, the moribund aerospace giants that are largely just making the same old rockets, entrenched in their job creation programs.

      And two, the new space companies, which are making suborbital rocketplanes and cheap boosters. At present, they may not look impressive because of small steps they are taking, but you just have to look at Scaled's Space Ship Two to realize that radical innovation in their design is not dead.

      This has been a long time coming, and there has been a dark age in aerospace.

      If you are interested, in my view the seminal event in the new space industry was the Delta Clipper Program (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X).

      And now there are some really impressive companies trying to make space truly viable for everyone. Some of those companies are.

      XCOR Aerospace: http://xcor.com/
      Scaled Composites: http://scaled.com/
      Masten: http://masten-space.com/
      Armadillo: http://armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home

      Aside from aerospace. While I agree that there have been game changers like the cell phone, I do agree with Kasparov that there is an atmosphere of risk aversion. For instance I don't see any daring research programs like when DARPA funded Engelbart's augment research that led to Human User Interface objects like the mouse. And that disturbs me. Often visionaries look very crazy or at best very hard to understand because they are operating…

    • crussoMay 2012

      The funny thing is that the people making their money in software and entertainment: John Carmack, Elon Musk, Larry Page, James Cameron, etc... are the ones getting us to space and re-igniting the space program that the general population lost interest in funding a long time ago.

      http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-205_162-57419801/asteroid-mining-venture-backed-by-james-cameron-google-ceo-larry-page/
      http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home
      http://www.spacex.com/

      I say: Let the people with big ideas and great implementation skills make all the money they can legally. They're the ones we want to fund so they can pursue new interests and create new markets.

    • manaskarekarApr 2013

      James Gosling: Liquid Robotics http://www.liquidr.com/news_events/press/2011/2011-08-30-gosling.html

      John D. Carmack: Armadillo Aerospace http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home

      I'm tempted to throw in Google's Sergey Brin (Larry Page too?) for Google Glass.

      And I'm sure there are a few others. Elon Musk just shows up more in the news due to his success.

      Also, not all billionaires are technically inclined geeks.

    • jsjenkins168Sep 2007

      Wow, thats cool. So it just uses thrust vectoring to move around and hover? It would have to be pretty advanced to cope with the rotation forces of the impeller.

      Seeing this fly reminds me of Armadillo Aerospace's Pixel:
      http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home

      But obviously Pixel is intended to fly into space and is rocket powered..

    Related

    NASA Blogsblogs.nasa.gov249 people

    NASA's Voyager 1 Resumes Sending Engineering Updates to Earth

    NASA Blogs
    Company · last shared 2025
    Space Exploredspaceexplored.com36 people

    Elon Musk says SpaceX faces ‘genuine risk of bankruptcy’ from Starship engine

    Space Explored
    Publication · last shared 2025
    RTL-SDR.comrtl-sdr.com251 people

    Flipper Zero dark web firmware bypasses rolling code security

    RTL-SDR.com
    Publication · last shared 2026
    Parabolic Arcparabolicarc.com44 people

    Musk: SpaceX to Attempt Falcon 9 First Stage Water Landing

    Parabolic Arc
    Publication · last shared 2023
    Uber Newsroomnewsroom.uber.com142 people

    A profound apology

    Uber Newsroom
    Company · last shared 2017
    The Orbital Indexorbitalindex.com28 people

    DARPA moving forward with nuclear thermal engine design

    The Orbital Index
    Publication · last shared 2026
    Fly.io Blogfly.io555 people

    My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

    Fly.io Blog
    Company · last shared 2026
    sUAS Newssuasnews.com44 people

    World’s largest multirotor makes successful maiden flight

    sUAS News
    Publication · last shared 2026