Tren Griffin writes lists of lessons drawn from investors and founders such as Munger, Naval Ravikant and Paul Graham.
Commenters praise Griffin's posts as great, and link them for venture capital, mental models, business analysis and examples of premature scaling.
Related:
Mike Maples Sr., 1942-2025: Microsoft’s ‘adult in the room’ had a deep impact on the company - https://www.geekwire.com/2025/mike-maples-sr-1942-2025-microsofts-adult-in-the-room-had-a-deep-impact-on-the-company/
A Dozen Things I’ve Learned From Mike Maples Sr. About Business and Investing - https://25iq.com/2016/07/01/a-dozen-things-ive-learned-from-mike-maples-sr-about-business-and-investing/
Mr. Michael J. Maples, Sr. - IT History Society - https://www.ithistory.org/honor-roll/mr-michael-j-maples-sr
140: Mike Maples, Sr. - Microsoft Legend | Legends & Losers Podcast [video] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHjDxy1Czys
Mike Maples Interview - 7 May 2004 - https://www.robertgaskins.com/powerpoint-history/documents/ensmenger-cbi-interview-mike-maples-oh387mm-2004-may-07.pdf
> Seems like market valuations aren't that closely tied to profitability at the moment...
This trope needs to die. Not all "profitability" is the same.
A few things to note:
- "You will see many people talk about Amazon’s focus on “growth” vs. margins, but the right focus is instead absolute dollar fee cash flow."[0]
- SaaS revenue is different.[1]
- NetSuite's most profitable year was in 2009 (yes that 2009 when the great recession happened) because they simply turned off the S&M engine. [2]
[0] - https://25iq.com/2014/04/26/a-dozen-things-i-have-learned-from-jeff-bezos/
[1] - https://a16z.com/2014/05/13/understanding-saas-valuation-primer/
[2] - https://soundcloud.com/a16z/a16z-podcast-why-saas-revenue-is-worth-more-than-traditional-software-sales
From the LP pov, it boils down to capital concentration. Most LPs I've spoken with are not that different from Michael Kim (LP from the article) in that they are for capital concentration. It is the most controversial part of the offering.
Reference:
http://25iq.com/2013/01/16/charlie-munger-on-investment-concentration-versus-diversification/
http://robgo.org/2013/10/21/decision-making-speed-of-big-funds-vs-seed-funds/
https://twitter.com/trengriffin/status/264789822982471680
https://twitter.com/sama/status/458094667972624384
That said, in the end, real performance trumps everything.
In a way, these dynamics remind me of the movie theater business. Here's a good read:
https://25iq.com/2017/12/30/moviepass-premature-scaling/
Given that music is generally not a substitutable good, margins can only be so strong on the core streaming product to your very point. I'm not really aware of any other revenue stream they may have (do they do ads?) and am curious what they might propose. Presumably they do have enough scale to be possible successful with something tied to monetizing their user data whether through ads or some other value-added service?
Really Batista is like an anti-Musk. I'm not sure I could find two billionaires(ex-billionaire) who were further apart.
Charlie Munger's quote I read in Poor Charlie's Almanack a really long time ago resonated with me pretty well when I saw Batista being interviewed on Charlie Rose years back. “Bernie Ebbers and Ken Lay were caricatures – they were easy to spot. They were almost psychopaths." * Since no copy of the book online, https://25iq.com/charlie-munger-book-to-date-chapters-1-5/
Looking at the dot-com era, it probably would be more likely to compare crypto to the sudden rise and collapse of the 'dark fiber' companies.
https://25iq.com/2017/11/11/the-1990s-telecom-bubble-what-can-we-learn/
"Om Malik wrote a book on this period in which he estimated that $750 billion vanished when the telecom bubble burst. That’s a reasonable estimate in my view. The most interesting questions about a phenomenon like this are always: Why did it happen? What can we learn?"